Blog

Challenge by the State in CWP No. 2489 of 2018, titled as State of H.P. & others Vs. Suresh Chand Heer & others and CWP No. 6972 of 2021, titled as State of H.P. & others versus Kavita Thakur & others, is to the order dated 09.01.2018, passed by the erstwhile State Administrative Tribunal, Shimla […]

Challenge by the State in CWP No. 2489 of 2018, titled as State of H.P. & others Vs. Suresh Chand Heer & others and CWP No. 6972 of 2021, titled as State of H.P. & others versus Kavita Thakur & others, is to the order dated 09.01.2018, passed by the erstwhile State Administrative Tribunal, Shimla

2025:HHC:17166 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No. 7185 of 2020 Reserved on: 29.5.2025 Date of decision: 2.6.2025 Babli Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Another. …Respondents. Corum Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes. For the Petitioner. Mr.Rakesh Kumar

1 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:16997 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 44 of 2021 Reserved on: 23.05.2025 Decided on: 30.05.2025 _____________________________________________________ Lekh Raj alias Dodu …..Appellant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ……Respondent _________________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting? Yes _____________________________________________________ For

This order shall dispose of application, filed by the applicant/appellant Vipin Thakur, under Section 430 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking suspension of sentence awarded by the learned Special Judge-II, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, District Shimla, H.P., vide judgment of conviction, dated 20.03.2023, and order of sentence, dated Whether reporters of Local Papers

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 388 of 2025 Reserved on: 15.05.2025 Date of Decision: 02.06.2025 Asha Guleria …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others …. Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate. For the

Petitioner Devi Roop has filed the present petition, against the judgment dated 26.2.2022, passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1I, Solan District Solan, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellate Court’), in Criminal 2 2025:HHC:16985 Appeal No. 10AK/10 of 2019, titled as, ‘Devi Roop vs. SBI’. 2. By way of judgment dated 26.2.2022,

( 2025:HHC:17043 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA OMP No’s 94 & 851 of 2024 in Execution Petition No. 19 of 2023 Reserved on: May 13 , 2025 Decided on: June 02 , 2025 State of Himachal Pradesh & ors. …Petitioners/Original Claimant No. 2/DH/ Applicant. Versus E.I.H. Limited & ors. …Respondents/Original Claimant

( 2025:HHC:17043 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA OMP No’s 94 & 851 of 2024 in Execution Petition No. 19 of 2023 Reserved on: May 13 , 2025 Decided on: June 02 , 2025 State of Himachal Pradesh & ors. …Petitioners/Original Claimant No. 2/DH/ Applicant. Versus E.I.H. Limited & ors. …Respondents/Original Claimant

( 2025:HHC:17043 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA OMP No’s 94 & 851 of 2024 in Execution Petition No. 19 of 2023 Reserved on: May 13 , 2025 Decided on: June 02 , 2025 State of Himachal Pradesh & ors. …Petitioners/Original Claimant No. 2/DH/ Applicant. Versus E.I.H. Limited & ors. …Respondents/Original Claimant