Blog

2025:HHC:17520 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 977 of 2025 Reserved on: 28.05.2025 Date of Decision: 04.06.2025. Mehul Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate. For the Respondent […]

[2020:HHC:10518-DB] IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.267 of 2020 Reserved on: 29.05.2025 Announced on : 04.06.2025 __________________________________________________________ Satya Devi …..Petitioner Versus The State of H.P. and others ……Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? Yes For the petitioner:

Instant Letters Patent Appeal arises from a dispute concerning the payment for forest produce sold by respondent No. 1, Rajeev Chauhan, to the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation (hereinafter “appellant”) under a regulatory statutory framework. 2. Himachal Pradesh Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1982 (hereinafter “Act”), provides for constitution of Advisory Committee to aid

2025:HHC:17537 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.904 of 2024 Reserved on : 19.05.2025 Decided on : 04.06.2025 Rakesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate.

2025:HHC:17292 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 882 of 2025 Reserved on: 28.05.2025 Date of Decision: 03.06.2025 Shavta Pun …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:17298 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 1068 of 2025 Reserved on: 26.05.2025 Date of Decision: 03.06.2025. Robin Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi

2025:HHC:17294 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MPM Nos. 1197 and 1198 of 2025 Reserved on: 28.05.2025 Date of Decision: 03.06.2025 1. Cr.MP(M) No. 1197 of 2025 Pradeep Jharta ….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent 2. Cr.MP(M) No. 1198 of 2025 Jagdish Kumar ….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram Hon’ble

Since common questions of facts as well as law are involved in both the above-captioned cases, this Court heard them together and the same are now being disposed of vide common judgment. 2. Relevant facts, which are otherwise common in both the cases, are that petitioner herein was appointed as a Home Guard in 7

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:17297 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA and 986 of 2025 Cr. MP (M) Nos. 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921 of 2025 reserved on 16.05.2025 and Cr.MP(M) No. 986 of 2025 reserved on 26.05.2025 Date of Decision: 03.06.2025 1. Cr.MP(M) No. 916 of 2025 Mast Ram …Petitioner

Challenge by the State in CWP No. 2489 of 2018, titled as State of H.P. & others Vs. Suresh Chand Heer & others and CWP No. 6972 of 2021, titled as State of H.P. & others versus Kavita Thakur & others, is to the order dated 09.01.2018, passed by the erstwhile State Administrative Tribunal, Shimla