Ajay Kumar and others vs. State of H.P. and others
CWP No. 1576 of 2025
23.01.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents and seeks time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.1864 of 2025
The applicants initially joined as Junior Basic
Teachers. Subsequent thereto, they were appointed as Head
Teachers. Vide Annexures P-5 and P-6 benefits of FR-
22(I)(a)(i) have been denied to the applicants, in the case at
hand. Learned counsel on behalf of the applicants submits that
on the post of a Head Teacher, responsibilities are higher than
that of Junior Basic Teacher. In view thereof, he placed
reliance upon the judgment dated 05.05.2008, passed in CWP
No.124 of 2001, titled State of HP Vs. Ram Das Kaundal and
judgment dated 24.07.2010, passed in CWP No.1122 of 2010,
titled Narinder Singh Chauhan Vs. State of HP & Ors. In view of
the law laid down therein, impugned order dated 20.04.2022
(Annexure P-5) and letter dated 25.06.2024 (Annexure P-6),
are stayed during the pendency of the present petition.
Application stands disposed of.